Previous Page  12 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Page 12

However significant changes apply to the main

legal basis used for

targeted advertising

:

Consent:

to be valid, consent must be

unambiguous, informed, specific and freely given.

• Unambiguous:

a clear and affirmative action

is

now required to obtain a valid consent from the

user. Silence, pre-ticked boxes or inactivity are

no longer sufficient.

• Informed: the consent request and the nature of

the processing must be presented in a manner

which is

clearly distinguishable from other

matters

, in an

intelligible

and easily accessible

form, using

clear and plain language

.

• Specific: the data subject should be aware

at least of the

identity

of the controller and

the

purposes

for which the personal data

will be processed, as well as the r

ecipients or

categories of recipients

of the personal data

6

.

• Freely given: consent is presumed not to be

freely given:

-- where there is a

clear imbalance

between

the data subject and the controller;

PART

03:

GROUNDS FOR PROCESSING personal data

The list of legal grounds allowing the processing of personal data does not change:

Consent

Legitimate

interest

Performance

of a contract

Legal

obligation

Vital interest

of the data

subject

Public

interest

-- if the data subject has

no genuine choice

or is unable to refuse or withdraw consent

without detriment;

-- and/or if the provision of a service

is

dependent on

(consenting to) the

processing of personal data despite such

processing

not being necessary

for the

provision of the requested service.

The last two bullet points cast a doubt on the future

interpretation of a valid and freely given consent

with regard to so-called “tracking walls”, i.e. the

capacity for website providers to block access to

their content if users oppose the processing of

their data for tracking purposes

7

.

This will only be resolved through GDPR

implementation. Should Member States or the

Courts decide to adopt a restrictive interpretation

of this provision, broadcasters and sales houses

may have to adapt their business models (e.g.

offering a pay-for alternative which may help

qualify the consent as freely given).