Previous Page  9 / 20 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

Page 9

© Copyright egta 2015. All rights reserved.

figure 04:

A comparison of the pros and cons of declarative

and passive methodologies

Diary/Day-After Recall

Electronic: Passive Measurement

• Traditional and established method: stability of

the advertising sales market

• Lower cost

• Large sample

• Potential for more user-friendly format (online

diary, smartphone applications), leads to

higher respondent commitment

• Generally delivers higher TSL figures than

electronic measurement

• Lack of common radio and TV currency

• Lower accountability and granularity: deliver-

ing listening rate per quarter/half an hour, and

infrequent reporting

• Lower accuracy: inability of people to recall

and identify every listening occasion after time

(short listening occurrences tend to be forgot-

ten, listening to favourite stations is amplified)

• Higher burden on the respondent

• Longer delay between data collection and

reporting

• Bringing common currency to TV and radio

buys

• Higher accountability and granularity: minute-

by-minute audience data

• Continuous listening and all listening occasions

measured

• Low dropout expected due to lower respond-

ent burden

• Better optimisation of radio programme and

campaign planning due to overnight reporting

• Very short delay between data collection and

reporting, bringing radio into closer alignment

with TV and online

• More reliable differentiation between broad-

cast platforms (with watermarking technology)

• Reluctance towards adoption: lack of consen-

sus and unified support among the industry

actors

• Measuring presence in proximity to radio

signal, different definition of listening and dif-

ferent basis for brand recall research

• Small sample efficiency

• Higher cost

• Audio-matching devices may not differenti-

ate between stations broadcasting the same

content at the same time

• Watermarking devices do not capture 100% of

listening occasions, and may perform poorly in

high background noise situations

• Generally delivers lower TSL than traditional

methodologies, requiring the buying market to

accept changes to advertising pricing

• Headphone listening can only be captured if

respondent links to the meter’s output jack

• Difficult and expensive to build a robust

sample for a fragmented market.